Colonel retires: pull ALL SUMS Hello Soldiers, I promised a post exceptional way, you will have it good. For a year I scored all the votes in the report, all the minutes played, the presence, goals and so on and so forth. Taking stock at end of season of course we all know that we have won yet another championship (most important), we have achieved 48 goals and we conceded 15. Not bad. Our top scorer with 12 goals was Prestipino, followed by Pino, Cogley and Cutroneo with 4. The first goal he scored in Furci Prestia - Motta 4-0. The latest in Ali D'Amico - Furci 4-3. The network has marked the promotion or Giannetto Pino in Pelorus - Furci 1 - 2. The player with most appearances was Cogley, who played 22 times, that is, every game and then complain that never played, followed by 21 and Nancy Palate. The player who has played more minutes was palate, with 1780, followed by 1614 and then Cutroneo Giannetto with 1528. What he played was less Livio with just 35 minutes played in five appearances. The players were replaced with 12 and Casale Prestia with 10. The player who went in several times per game with 12 Coglitore course was to follow with Cristian Trimarchi 11.Ho also calculated the average rate, obviously it based on all league games, so even those that are in the blog, the first here. I have not calculated the without a vote because it seems to me a lack of objectivity because so many were sincere and that was normal with 5 substitutions per game that someone should come in the last minute and so can not take votes. However, calculating those who have played at least 10 games (ie the mean I did it for everyone, but for example Andronaco has the highest average attendance, however, has only 4, so I thought to rank it would take at least 10 admissions). He who has the highest average is 7.00 Prestipino, followed Cutroneo with 6.75 and then 6.63 Loans. The average lower than 5.64 D. Trimarchi but has only 9 appearances, most of those who have the lowest average attendance is 5.88 with Lo Re, Cogley, or 6.00. The higher the vote took Fasolo 9, or 8.5 Muscolino, the lowest D'Amico connectors are 4. The best goal I do not know ... you name it. Now let's remember that for each individual at the end for me if I wanted to put the player confirmed he went or not, but you are touchy and you feel all Maradona, then this the little man, even if the opinion of all must be respected, indeed it is I put so much ... then I retire ... Final Scoreboard:
Attendance - Min.giocati - Goals - Replaced - succeed - Average rating
COCUCCIO 16-1285 - 6 (sustained) - 4 - 1 to 6.46 +1 without a vote. For him my final grade is 7: He started beating all the unbeaten record, then was put aside, even though he was training for study shortly. He then responded to everyone with the facts in the field. To be confirmed. DANTE
Pr: 12 - Min to play.: 1005 Goals: 0 Replace: 1 - succeed: 0 M.voto 6.50 +1 s.v. For him my vote is 7: Played with experience, training, professionalism, unnecessary controversy with Fasolo after the game with Mandanici, to be confirmed. MERCURY
Pr: 10 - Min play: 686 Goals: 0 Replace: 6 takeover: 0 Mvoto: 6.20. For him my vote is 6.5: He always played well at times screaming too but his experience has helped, out of place after replacing his polemic against Mongiuffi, because there are those who trained him and not more than never played. But his professionalism has always been enviable.
NIOS Pr: 17 - Min play: 1485 Goals: 0 Replace: 2 Suben: 0 Mvoto: 6.52. For him my vote is 8: E 'him to have the best average defense and is not by chance. Always the stronger our robot. Head has always dominated and put a muzzle on all the strikers who were passing by. To be confirmed.
PALATE Pr: 21 min play: 1780 Goals: 0 Replace: 0 Suben: 2 Mvoto: 6.40. For him my vote is 7.5: How much work is as a player and manager, has always played with commitment and professionalism, to be confirmed and if you do not want as a player, at least one director. A man of confidence of the coach as it was almost always the owner.
Chillemi Pr: 21 min game: 1436 Goals: 1 Sub: 2 Suben: Mvoto 1: 6.35. For him my vote is 7.5: A very good defender, fast and powerful butt, it will be a cornerstone of our team will improve even if that temper. From travel to reconfirm.
Carnabuci Pr: 9 Min play: 439 Goals: 1 Replace: 3 Suben: 3 Mvoto: 5.50: My vote for him is 6: How could give more, see his last match against Ali. He played under pressure and perhaps this has not helped. He ride quality, less tactics, but on this with a good coach can improve. May fall in the plans for next year. PINE
Pr: 21 min game: 1236 Goals: Sub 4: 7 Suben: 7 Mvoto: 6.18 +2 sv. My vote is for him 7.5: An end of season with a bang. Technical qualities but has not excelled his dedication and commitment even to clean the dressing rooms when they could stay home and watch a movie eventually rewarded him with a lot of goals heavy. To be confirmed.
Muscolino Pr: 20 Min Play: 1360 Goals: 3 Sub: 8 Suben: 4 Mvoto 6.10. My vote is for him 7: I could give him less often since the square was a theater (of course, always after a replacement, or after having not played). He played only two good games against the Roccalumera, then another good test as well but never could. His average is scarsotta and sometimes in place to respond to evil and theaters could understand to be his first experience in a football team and thank you for being 16 Sometimes the owner. However, to be confirmed because Mercury is not eternal.
Cogley Pr: 22 Min Thu: 1130 Goals: Sub 4: 9 Suben: 12 Mvoto: 6.00 + 1SV: My vote for him is 6.5: At the beginning of the championship has often been used proprietor, then the last part is was relegated to the bench because when he had the 'opportunity did not fully convinced, Contesse apart, often came later, but his contribution has always given honest. Even when he could rely on his reason education has always preferred not to feed useless polemics.
ANNONI Pr: 15 Min play: 773 Goals: 3 Sub: 5 Suben: 8 Mvoto: 6.36: My vote for him is 6.5: Players with major ride quality, but in times that were deployed holder does not always, except in Motta, played well with conviction. For example against Mongiuffi played perhaps his worst game and we know that before the race claimed space as the only player left wing. But it's always been the decisions of the coach, who perhaps had not much confidence in him, trying to engage even more from him and this must give way. May meet the plans for next season. THE RE
Pr: 10 Min play: 557 Goals: 0 Replace: 5 Suben: 3 Mvoto 5,88 +1 sv: My vote for him is 6.5: Wanted aloud by Fasolo, that he had great confidence , has made its contribution without overdoing it. Could give more but an injury stopped him. To be confirmed.
TRIMARCHI C. Pr: 13 Min play: 299 Goals: 3 Sub: 1 Suben: 11 Mvoto: 6.11 My vote for him is 6.5: Obviously you could not expect him to 10 goals and 10 assists but has contributed also important in terms of the locker room.
Cutroneo Pr: 18 Min Play: 1614 Goals: Sub 4: 1 Suben: 0 Mvoto 6.75. My vote is for him 8: E 'was undoubtedly the best player of the season. Never played so well. E 'is continuous and often dragged the team with his performance. It would be foolish not miss a player with these qualities. Must be a strong point again next year. Excellent in the set pieces. To be confirmed and running.
GIANNETTO Pr: 19 Min Play: 1528 Goals: 1 Replace: 8 Suben: 1 Mvoto6, 44 +1 sv. My vote for him is 7.5: He played a good season, having its peak in the return match against the Pelorus, a race where he scored his only goal. It 'was always used by the coach, who enjoyed a lot of sign fiducia.A midfield has contributed. Equipped with excellent technical qualities. To be confirmed.
PRESTIA Pr: 20 Min Play: 1234 Goals: 3 Sub: 10 Suben: 4 Mvoto: 6.63 +1 sv. My vote for him is 7.5: He started the greater is the best in the early races. E 'was used almost always out of role and could not express its value. Almost always be replaced even if it has one of the highest average, sign that the coach had not much confidence in him. Often, however, could give more, and was estranged from the game resulting in a couple of games soon enough, especially when playing outside, even if in the end he is a center. To be confirmed.
CASALE Pr: 13 Min play: 979 Goals: 3 Sub: 12 Suben: 0 Mvoto: 6.57. My vote for him is 7.5: He played a season full of heart and grit. Unfortunately, the ongoing physical problems they did not give you the best. It was possible to train too little, in fact the coach has often been replaced but it still holds. One as he obviously has to be confirmed.
Prestipino Pr: 12 Min play: 955 Goals: 12 Sub: 3 Suben: 2 Mvoto: 7.00. My vote for him is 8: It 's amazing that a striker has made an average of one goal every 79'. Paradoxically, often has been criticized because with him the maneuver was not as smooth beginning of the year. Maybe it's true, but in many circumstances has raised the chestnuts from the fire, resulting in the sound of a decisive goal. Could say in the higher classes, it will be difficult to hold Furci because some will offer the credo.E 'to confirm and hold your nails as a striker because he is not in the area.
RINA 'Pr: 8 Min play: 223 Goals: 0 Replace: 1 Suben: 6 Mvoto: 5.81. My vote for him is 6: He played very little, but objectively when he played did not have that fighting spirit to win the post. He must be bad, perhaps as it should be a pastime he took it in style uisp, but this year for those who had to play very nearly came to blows altri.Sempre respectful of the choices.
PUGLISI Pr: Min 5 game: 35 Goals: 0 Replace: 0 Suben: 4 Mvoto: 6.16 +1 sv. My vote for him is 6.5: How I feel sorry for lui.Ho seen a few players in the square Furci have so much desire to play. I have not seen so many workouts in fact very few, but he was always the most willing. The possibility of playing in 22 games he had for 35 minutes. Too bad. We hope that they do not make the mistake coming from registering 40 persone.Da reconfirm if not as a player as the head of the ultras.
Briguglio Pr: 3 Min Game: 270 Goals: 1 (soon) Sub: 0 \u200b\u200bSuben: 0 Mvoto: 7.00: My vote is for him 7: Both the goalkeeper where he played great and put us both midfielder the heart. Maybe you would also have to play in next door. To be confirmed although it is difficult.
Andronaco Pr: 4 Min play: 305 Goals: 4 (sustained) Replace: 0 Suben: Mvoto 1: 7.12. My vote is for him 7: He played in goal a few races, but showed his valore.Strepitosa the parade against the Riviera. To be confirmed because he and Cocuccio could be our two goalkeepers for next year.
TRIMARCHI D. Pr: 9 Min play: 183 Goals: 1 Replace: 0 Suben: 9 Mvoto: 5.64 +2 sv. The I voted for him is 5.5: At the beginning of the championship for the first 5 races have been increasingly entering. But he has never been decisivo.Più famous for the wrong goals for those facts. Could give more, but maybe some other team will be more space here because she do not have much.
LIFE Pr: 6 Min play: 141 Goals: 1 Replace: 1 Suben: 5 Mvoto: 6.10 sv +1 My vote for him is 6: Often on the bench a few times but when I complained he did was exaggerated. What he wanted to knit it was understood when he leaped on the 6 to 0 against Mandanici. She gave her honest contribution. RUSSIAN
Pr: 1 Min play: 45 Goals: 0 Replace: 1 Suben: 0 Mvoto: 7.00. My vote for him is 6: It was not training a year to play 45 '. And he also played well so much so that took 7.
BURGIO Pr: 4 Min play: 220 Goals: 4 (sustained) Replace: 0 Suben: 1 Mvoto: 6.16 sv +1 My vote is for him 6.5: Will not let go even when he could not play and were deployed . He trained with consistency and commitment. BALLET
Pr: 4 Min play: 175 Goals: 1 Sub: 2 Suben: 2 Mvoto: 5.87. My vote for him is 6: At least his first as a starter scored. It has no such assurance and has so much determination, even though he is improving compared to a year ago. FRANCO
Pr: 3 Min Game: 57 Goals: 1 Replace: 0 Suben: 3 Mvoto: 6.00 +1 sv. My vote for him is 6: A sensational goal against Peloro then had no consistency in training, could be used several times if he trained.
Carnabuci M Pr: 1 Min play: 40 Goals: 0 Replace: 0 Suben: Mvoto 1: 6.00. My vote for him is 6: I apologize if a lot in the last match against Ali I did not put his assessment, I have forgotten. I'm invecchiando.Ha made his honest game without overdoing it. D'AMICO
Pr: 3 Min Game: 210 Goals: 1 Sub: 2 Suben: 0 Mvoto: 5.50. My vote is for him 5.5: He had two great chances as a starter but has not yet demonstrated the personality necessary to be an owner. Too bad because what I felt during training showed good qualities, but the game is another matter, alas.
VINCI Pr: 1 Min game: 50 Goals: 0 Replace: 1 Suben: 0 Mvoto: 6. My vote is for him 7: Obviously not the player, but as I do not know what ... but without him the Furci there, thanks Tino ... I want to attack the center with Charles Metauro ...
Fasoli Average rating: 6 , 65 (7-6,5-8-6-6,5-6,5-6,5-7-9-5,5-6,5-7-6-7-5-7-7-6 -7-8-6-5,5). All votes of Mr. Fasolo. As we see there is a nine and eight two and the thing that makes me laugh you know what you complained about the game against Riviera's why I put 6. Not sure what this makes me angry because it often took a lot of guys with poor grades and a lot of humility and education have taken up and committed themselves more prima.Va Well I do not want to say anything, we close here. E 'right to give to Caesar what is Caesar's, I unlike many objective. Entangled with that memorable as the famous 4-5-1 Roccalumera the third day. Even better against Peloro even if they have to say thanks to the state of grace to all holders who have made the perfect match. Excellent deployment on the way back in the match-high point against the Pelorus, and still won big with a 4-5-1, the ace up the sleeve of Fasolo.Nel half high and low for him like everyone else, from training perfect right to do wrong by changes in exchange rates unnecessary, but of course that there is, even in Furci Lippi would be spared from critiche.Il my vote for him is 7.
COMPANY '7 We say that races away could be better organized. They have heard that Fasolo rightly wanted to halve the group but we hope no matter who the coach Mimmo Ucchino as if there are rumors or if it remains Fasolo and Louis Spadaro, or do not know who will speak out clearly from the beginning there are people who may otherwise remain evil. Colonel Nathan Jessep
... ... ... ... What goes into retirement I think I had already anticipated. What is certain is that if I lost some time to write posts and if you are Cossacks at night after work I put here for you to write to say that some 'good you wanted it. Over the years I've mellowed, last year I was more critical, but sometimes you have to be encouraged to obtain each risultati.Secondo me was the protagonist in his own way a little story to tell in this season, I could write a book about you, but then as soon as there is a there is little criticism of those who are offended then I will just give me a vote yet I: I DO A NICE 5, or less than all, because only a fool would waste time behind you. I have completed my mission of Colonel, now I wish you good luck. Sometimes I thought it was you because the egocentric respond to any critical threat, see Muscolino, Casale, Fasolo, TrimarchiD., D'Amico, and a bit 'all and I promptly toned down. Then there were the supervisors, friends, like the large and very nice Australian and the legendary Jerry Allen and also that sometimes politely criticized my report cards and I have always respected his opinion but not everyone has done so with me, the anonymous type. But then I thought that you were right, I end up self-centered and are more resentful that I was going to respond, even if I hide behind a mask that now I want to throw not recover. Do not write a single word can make all the criticism that you want in the comments to this post I will not go more in the blog as a Colonel. At first it was a game then it has become a must now for me is already past. The Colonel Nathan Jessep retires greets you and a big hug once more. It 'been a pleasure ...
